Le 22 déc. 2013 à 18:40, Adam Smalin <acidzombi...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> I forgot to CC this to the group a few days ago. > > >The token precedences apply to the tokens immediately before and after the > >parsing ‘.’ (as in the .output file) in the shift/reduce conflicting rules. > >The grammar must be written so that the tokens appear in such a position. > > | rval '=' rval %prec '.' ',' rval That's bad style, move your "%prec '.'" at the end of the rule. It means the same, but it's clearer. And therefore notice that now, this rule has the precedence of '.', not that of '='. > conflict file: > > > rval '=' rval . ',' rval > Conflict between rule 343 and token ',' resolved as reduce (',' < '='). So it's bizarre that in that conditions bison still refers to '='. > Shouldn't it have worked? I tried putting %prec at the end of the line and > after the ',' as well and it failed. I tried multiple places at once and got > an error saying only one %prec per line. Please, post a self contained and minimal example. _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison