> Le 10 mai 2019 à 16:28, Christian Schoenebeck <schoeneb...@crudebyte.com> a > écrit : > > On Freitag, 10. Mai 2019 06:57:00 CEST Derek Clegg wrote: >> In fact, I do not think error messages in the generated parser should be >> provided by bison, except as a trivial default. Instead, I’d like to see >> bison call a function (which I provide) when a syntax error occurs, with a >> list of what was expected along with what was encountered. Obviously, they >> should be provided without translation. That would be the most flexible. > > Yep, I can just agree.
Except that you don't. The API that was proposed initially did not fit your need. At least, that was my understanding of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-bison/2019-02/msg00018.html Listen guys (Derek, Christian): how about you submit a patch of what you think the feature should be? Then it will be _much_ easier to discuss. First, agree together (you two), then see what is the reaction here, including mine, obviously (since in practice, AFAICT, nobody else is offering to spend time to maintain Bison :-). I plan to release 3.4 soon, and to revive what I had done for the internationalisation of error messages. If we coordinate ourselves correctly, the focus of 3.5 could be error messages. Cheers! _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
