Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: am_policy_hub class set after common bundles?
Author: terok
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25731,25731#msg-25731
Hi,
Out of curiosity, when is am_policy_hub class suppose to be set?
Did some testing and it's somehow set only _after_ the common bundles are
evaluated.
I would expect it to be one of the first classes that the agent sets.
Running the following on policy_hub:
body common control
{
bundlesequence => { "example" };
}
bundle common g
{
vars:
"host1" string => "10.10.10.10";
"host2" string => "10.11.11.11";
am_policy_hub::
"target" string => "$(g.host1)",
policy => "free";
!am_policy_hub::
"target" string => "$(g.host2)",
policy => "free";
reports:
linux::
"Target set in common: $(g.target)";
}
bundle agent example
{
classes:
"i_am_hub" expression => "am_policy_hub";
reports:
linux::
"Target set in sequence: $(g.target)";
i_am_hub::
"I am the policy hub!";
}
This will give me the 'wrong' target.
# cf-agent -K -f ./am_policy_hub.cf
R: Target set in sequence: 10.11.11.11
R: I am the policy hub!
Now, if I add the *g* bundle to the sequence, then I get the target that I'd
expect.
# cf-agent -K -f ./am_policy_hub.cf
R: Target set in common: 10.10.10.10
R: Target set in sequence: 10.10.10.10
R: I am the policy hub!
Which brings me to another question. Is there any downside including common
bundles to the bundlesequence?
/Tero
_______________________________________________
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
