No freebsd experience here either, so this is mostly for my own edification, but hard classes on a redhat machine include:
redhat redhat_ws redhat_ws_3 Are multiple hard classes, including 'freebsd_4', or 'freebsd_5', not also defined in a similar way on freebsd boxes? If not, it seems like a desirable feature request... -Ed On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 16:21, Atom Powers wrote: > Is it possible to glob hard class names? > For instance I currently have: > -- > Groups: > freebsd_4 = ( freebsd_4_11_STABLE freebsd_4_10_STABLE > freebsd_4_10_RELEASE_p3 ) > freebsd_5 = ( freebsd_5_3_RELEASE freebsd_5_3_STABLE ) > -- > > But I'm still missing a lot of systems. "freebsd_5_4_PRERELEASE", for > example, won't match either group. Can I do something like: > > -- > Groups: > freebsd_4 = ( freebsd_4_* ) > freebsd_5 = ( freebsd_5_* ) > -- > > Or is there another way to easily define a group for these hard classes? (And > still catch "freebsd_5_4_STABLE" when it is released.) > > ---- > Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. > > Atom Powers > Systems Administrator > Pyramid Breweries Inc. > 206.682.8322 x251 > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > Help-cfengine@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
