Ed Brown wrote: > Wouldn't Brendan's idea of multiple passes, well, converge quicker, > than waiting for multiple runs of cfengine to catch up with > 'uncleared' class definitions?
We could do both. :-) It might add more robustness to cfengine if unsatisfied dependencies were preserved between runs. What if the cfengine run is cut short before it completes all the necessary passes? I don't think that we can assume that cfagent will be able to complete all of it's tasks before being cut short by an admin running "/etc/init.d/cfengine stop" or some timeout causing aborts. _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine