When you do try that, can you send the configuration you used? I'd like to get a jump-start on using tramp again if possible.
- Chris Phil Betts writes: >On Friday, September 23, 2005 2:39 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >>> In the meantime if anyone can report success with NTemacs & Tramp then >>> I'd be keen to hear about it. >> >> I had a little success (I seem to recall it wasn't too difficult to use >> plink instead of ssh on windows), but my big problem was the fundamental >> flaws in tramp itself. It tries to do wayyy too many exotic things with >> shell scripts it pushes over to the remote side, and any system that >> differs even a little bit in subtle pieces of shell implementation >> falls over dead. If you are only trying to get to linux systems, >> it may be OK (or maybe it has improved over the years >> since my last impression of it). > >That was my experience too, but it was quite a long time ago. I'll >try to find time next week to give this a try using the latest of >everything (i.e. putty, tramp, NTemacs, cygwin) and report back. > >Phil >-- > >********************************************************************** >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify >the system manager. > >This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by >MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > >www.mimesweeper.com >********************************************************************** > > -- ================================ Chris McMahan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================
