Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
Can you please explain the exact tests you did. My own tests show the opposite, and the "test" that was posted earlier in this thread was bogus, as it tested whether bash works with process-coding-system set to undecided-dos, rather than testing if it works without setting process-coding-system.Lennart Borgman wrote:The Cygwin faq still recommends that process-coding-system-alist is set. See the page http://www.cygwin.com/faq/faq_toc.html, look for "What about NT Emacs". Should we tell them to change this recommendation or is there still a reason for it?According to my tests using bash on Emacs shell mode, it seems to be still needed.Cordially, Ismael |
- [h-e-w] Unix utilities for Emacs on MS Windows Lennart Borgman
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities for Emacs on MS W... Ismael Valladolid Torres
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities for Emacs on ... Lennart Borgman
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities for Emacs... Jason Rumney
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities for E... Lennart Borgman
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities ... Ismael Valladolid Torres
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilit... Jason Rumney
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities for Emacs... Ismael Valladolid Torres
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities for E... Lennart Borgman
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilities ... Ismael Valladolid Torres
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix utilit... Lennart Borgman
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix ut... Ismael Valladolid Torres
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix ut... Lennart Borgman
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix ut... Ismael Valladolid Torres
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix ut... Lennart Borgman
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix ut... Ismael Valladolid Torres
- Re: [h-e-w] Unix ut... Roman Belenov
