On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Konstantin<kosta...@yandex.ru> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:38:32 +0200 > Lennart Borgman <lennart.borg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hm, I see. Why don't you download the already built Emacs for windows >> then? Or do you especially want to try to build it? > > Well, yes I want to try to build it. > I have two reasons for it: > > 1. It's fun.
:-) > 2. It's long story... I cleared up, that pached version of emacs > have less cpu loading on scrolling, but it is rather bigger, > then all known (by me) other editors. The bug report of it > (if it is intresting): > > http://www.nabble.com/Bug-report:-Hight-CPU-loading-on-scrolling-td19825303.html It is better to link to the bug database, like this http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089 So if I understand you correctly you are trying to fix that problem? That is very nice, but perhaps it has already been fixed. Maybe you could ask again? To add more information or ask you should use the mail address that you find at the top of the page above (click on the bug number there). > (Two misprints are there: RAM 1024Gb ... RAM 633Gb - not Gb, but Mb, of > course) > > So, the key is to search for solution in the C-code. > > May be, something will changed, if emacs will be builded on OS > with default codepage cp1251. > > -- > Konstantin <kosta...@yandex.ru> > > >
