On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:15:24 +0100 Juanma Barranquero <lek...@gmail.com> wrote:
JB> 2012/1/26 Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com>: >> Christoph has been doing that, I think, so we can rely on his binaries. >> >> Christoph, can you add a GnuTLS build step to your Emacs build for >> Windows, so the latest GnuTLS version can be used on that platform? We >> had a long conversation about this and at least for now it seems to be >> the best approach (and we agreed it would not be a task for the core >> Emacs developers). If you prefer, I can set up a BuildBot to produce >> the GnuTLS DLLs for you. JB> Christoph's binaries are built against gnutls-3.0.9, but they do not JB> include the GnuTLS DLLs. Right, and GnuTLS 3.0.9 is not the latest. I meant he should be building against the latest GnuTLS, not include it. JB> Note (again) that the issue is not who builds the GnuTLS DLLs, but JB> whether they should be included with official (or semi-official, like JB> the snapshots) releases. I was gonna bring that up next :) What does "semi-official" mean? Can I work with Christoph to include the GnuTLS DLLs or not? If not, can we add a notice to his binaries announcements to tell users where to find prebuilt GnuTLS DLLs? Ted
