Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: > We already do: just invoke runemacs.exe rather than emacs.exe. > > As for forking a thread: it is a bit more complex than that. (We > already start at least 2 threads at startup.) The 2 most important > problems are (1) the same executable should be able to run in a text > terminal session under -nw, and (2) we don't want the GUI session to > have a console. runemacs.exe solves both. > > Any reasons not to close this bug?
(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) "Use runemacs" seems like it's the correct answer here, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
