It turns out this bug was introduced by a Fedora patch that released on Thursday. I've already send them a fix.
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 09:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Which version of flex with what compiler are you using? Did you obtain > your copy of flex fromt he official sources or did you get it from a > downstream packager? If from a downstream packager, please provide the > url for the download and any related information necessary to inspect > what changes that packager may have introduced. > > On Saturday, 14 January 2006,22:22 -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > > It looks like a recent update to flex introduced a dummy function to > > suppress warnings. The function name is generated from urandom. In my > > case, I'm seeing: > > > > _yy_dummy_uses_of_static_functions_b2f4_517d_02ff_b30c_3e5a_47d7_aaa3_3b5d_() > > > > Unfortunately, it seems that the random number generator isn't getting > > seeded properly, because the *same* random number is getting used for > > all three of the parsers that are getting compiled into my program. > > > > This is a regression! Programs with multiple lexers that used to compile > > just fine will no longer compile at all. > > > > Is there a way to suppress this "helpful" behavior? > > > > > > shap > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Help-flex mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-flex > _______________________________________________ Help-flex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-flex
