On 15 Jan 2013, at 09:57, Gautam Kapoor <gkap...@cadence.com> wrote: > This is true both for flex and flex++. > > Yes, my patch fixed that problem. Ideally, I would expect memcpy to be used > instead of a for-do there. But Martin (attached email) suggests that it could > be fixed by changing the buffer size. I have to try that. If one can choose > an optimal buffer size (may not always be possible), then the effect of this > for-do will be minimized.
The problem seems to be buffer implementation problem. So making it larger might work for a particular lexer but it does not fix the problem in Flex. Hans _______________________________________________ help-flex mailing list help-flex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-flex
