Dave Swegen wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 17:36 +0100, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>> Dave Swegen wrote:
>>> OK, the following line generates code that seems to incorrectly mark the
>>> option as required (which is certainly not my intention):
>>>
>>> option "sqn" - "sqn" argoptional multiple string
>>>
>> well if you don't want an option to be required you have to specify "no"
>> (by default an option is considered as required). "argoptional",
>> instead, means that the argument of that option is optional.
>
> Ah! Suddenly I see the light :)
>
>> I must confess that "no" is quite confusing, and infact I'll add the
>> keyword "optional" which is much more explicative (and "required" for
>> "yes") :-)
>
> Yes, that would be much more intuitive
in the release candidate I've uploaded these new keywords are available :-)
cheers
Lorenzo
--
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| Lorenzo Bettini ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 |
| PhD in Computer Science |
| Dip. Sistemi e Informatica, Univ. di Firenze |
| Florence - Italy (GNU/Linux User # 158233) |
| Home Page : http://www.lorenzobettini.it |
| http://music.dsi.unifi.it XKlaim language |
| http://www.purplesucker.com Deep Purple Cover Band |
| http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite |
| http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt |
| http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/gengen |
| http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/doublecpp |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
