> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lorenzo Bettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:38 PM
> To: Users list for gengetopt
> Subject: Re: [help-gengetopt] use unsigned iterator i in generated
> source
>
>
> Gyozo, PAPP (VBuster) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lorenzo Bettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:11 PM
> >> Gyozo, PAPP (VBuster) wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I running the latest 2.17rc. This version generates the
> >> getoptions_file_save() functions with a signed int i which
> >> results a lots of signed/unsigned warning. Please modify the
> >> corresponding .h_skel to use unsigned int.
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I checked this matter, and the code is
> >>
> >> for (i = 0; i < args_info->@[EMAIL PROTECTED]; ++i)
> >>
> >> which should not generate warnings, since the _given field
> is an int,
> >> and not an unsigned. I myself always compile the tests with
> >> -Wall so I
> >> should have received the warning too, which didn't happen... what
> >> warning do you get (in particular, which line of code
> generates the
> >> warning)?
> >
> > Sorry for the inconvenience, this was my fault. I patched
> my gengetopt and forgot it.
> >
>
> so the warning doesn't show up?
No, with the original tarball. This was the root of evil:
@@ -143,7 +141,7 @@
@[EMAIL PROTECTED](const char *filename, struct @args_info@ *args_info)
{
FILE *outfile;
- int i = 0;
+ unsigned int i = 0;
outfile = fopen(filename, "w");
Quite obvious. Once again, sorry to blame.
_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
