Papp Gyozo (VBuster) wrote:
I have explicitly said that I want enums.
So do I. ;)
However, 90 would not be a valid enum (since it starts with a
number)
What about rotate_90 after the option name in this example? In
general the <option>_<value> form would be a deliberate decision
because at this time I could change at least 5 string options to
enums in one of my apps. The bunch of simple "enum_"s may confuse
developers.
yes, that's a nice solution! :-)
hope to work on that soon!
cheers
Lorenzo
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DSI, Univ. di Firenze
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
