Tim Post wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 19:24 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
Many packagers are volunteers, just like many GNU developers are.
Flatly categorising them as "brain dead" is insulting.
There was no offense meant by that remark. I call myself brain dead on
(at least) a weekly basis.
... I am one of those packagers :)
Wow, the first almost-flame on the list... ;-)
just kidding!
however, if gcc 2.95 supports cstdlib and co, probably we should switch
to such headers... also because, if I'm not wrong, if the compiler
cannot handle cstdlib headers it won't handle iostream (without the .h)
either, am I right?
cheers
Lorenzo
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
