> however, I'm a bit reluctant about the command line option to disable, > since gengetopt is having quite a lot of them ;)
[off] some day you must really take a look at our command line jungle :)) (59) [on] However, I admit your concerns. I think that "include" is the most nature name you could come up with. Unfortunately others came up with the same name for something completely different. By the way, there is a theoretical problem with escaping. If an application is not prepared for that syntax, it might fail. I mean chances, probably fail probably not. It is certainly decreased by escaping because the syntax which may collide would be more complex, but the probability never will be 0 (zero). However, sticking to escaping we could use C style inclusion if it does not hurt too much: "include <file>" or something like that. I don't know how many people use this feature of gengetopt. _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
