> Well, the original source of this decision was that the first image > collection we used it on was one from Television Suisse Romande, in > which all the images were 256x256. Rescaling to this was a hack to allow > other images to be indexed with minimal changes to the code.
Oh yes. > Are you thinking of the one ultimately linking the diameter of the Space > Shuttle's booster rockets to the width of a horse :) Exact. > BTW, I do think that not rescaling will cause serious problems, since > the feature extraction code is premised on 16x16 blocks at the lowest > level, and using images of different sizes will result in the same block > feature ID being used to refer to different image locations for > different images. IDs are assigned simply by counting. Yes, this is clear. To translate: all images of one collection are to be resized to the same size. However, changing this size is not a problem (within limits). Right? Cheers, Wolfgang -- Dr. Wolfgang Müller LS Medieninformatik Universität Bamberg Check out the SIG MM web site http://www.sigmm.org _______________________________________________ help-GIFT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift
