Hello,
> I note that NEARNESS feature does not work with -r as "--from-here" does
not
> support the -r option.
...
> At present doing a regex search for "filterThings" does not respect
nearness order,

Since the --nearness is just a sort option, it is independent of type of
search,
I believe. It is helpful if you send a bug report about this to
[email protected].
Thank you in advance.

Regards,
Shigio


2017-03-11 7:22 GMT+09:00 Gautam Thaker <[email protected]>:

> I find the NEARNESS support to be very helpful in that where one has
> multiple definitions of the same token  NEARNESS more often then not find
> the definition I am interested in.
>
> I note that NEARNESS feature does not work with -r as "--from-here" does
> not support the -r option. Is it possible to extend to get this support? I
> have  a system in which I have 10s of definitions of type:
>
> ModuleA_filterThings(){}
> ModuleB_filterThings(){}
>
> I call these methods by reference, in code I have something like:
>
>     r->filterThings();
>
> where correct function pointer has been set so that in typically the
> "nearest" ModuleX_filterThings() would be correct definition.
>
> At present doing a regex search for "filterThings" does not respect
> nearness order, is it too difficult to get this?
>
> GHT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-global mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-global
>
>


-- 
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]>
PGP fingerprint:
26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F  1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB (Currently in use)
D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3 (Used until 2017/2)
_______________________________________________
Help-global mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-global

Reply via email to