If I put the -lcygwin in there, I get the multiple definition error. If I don't put the -lcygwin in there, I get the missing getreent error.
Is there some compile option I can give that will tell the compiler to ignore one of the malloc() or free() definitions? Joe McCollum Information Technology Specialist Forest Inventory and Analysis Knoxville TN 37919 -- "Ali Baharev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it important to use cygwin? There should be no trouble with other native compilers. Good luck! Ali On 7/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK I think I'm getting somewhere. > > I altered my compile statement to > > gcc sample.c -lm -lglpk -lcygwin > > Now I get: > > multiple definition of _malloc > multiple definition of _free > section .rdata overlaps section .text > > No executable is produced. > > Joe McCollum > Information Technology Specialist > Forest Inventory and Analysis > Knoxville, TN 37919 > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ _ > Save hundreds of dollars a year with Juno Internet access. > Plans start as low as $9.95 a month. Visit Juno today! > http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2- 2130421-170 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-glpk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk > ________________________________________________________________________ Save hundreds of dollars a year with Juno Internet access. Plans start as low as $9.95 a month. Visit Juno today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-170 _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
