On Friday 30 November 2007 10:40:41 ican.ozgur wrote: > > My guess without knowing the context is that it might be better to imply > > the three our booking rule in the resource constraints instead of forcing > > the next two variables to be one, as this will lead to all preceeding > > variables to be one. An alternative might be to have two types of > > variables, one that considers the "original" one and one with variables > > that are one based on the original ones. Dear Gustafsson, i'll appreciate if you elaborate more on booking rules. By the way i realized that if i insist on modeling the problem this way, it should be NP-hard, am i wrong? I will appreciate any other ideas. Thanks.
-- O. Ican _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
