> I am a new comer of GLPK and been very satisfied with it! Thank Makhorin > for his great works!
Thank you for your interest in glpk. >>From the FAQs (2004?) of the documentation, quadratic programming > solvers seems to be one of the future plan at that time. I wonder can we > see this in the near future? QP is not a paramount. I consider the following things as of paramount importance for glpk: 1) more robust and faster lp solver (currently working on it); 2) more robust and faster mip solver provided with a wider set of cutting plane generators. 3) network simplex (will start implementing it this autumn if nothing will prevent me from doing that :); 4) more robust and faster interior-point lp solver provided with a cross-over procedure. _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
