May be I should just try calling functions in glpk instead of using gmpl.Thank you very much.And I noticed that you have replyed most of the asking-for-help posts,you must be a very kind person.^^
Andrew Makhorin wrote: > >> I used a C program to form a gmpl program to solve my problem,for it >> has a huge number of variables.But some of the answers were missed,for >> example(I copied a part of the answers) >> 3851 wx[w1] B -2 >> 3852 wx[w2] B -2 >> 3853 wx[w3] B -2 >> 3854 wx[w4] B -2 >> 3855 wx[w5] B -2 >> 3856 wx[w6] B -2 >> 3857 wx[w14] B -2 >> 3858 wx[w19] B -2 >> 3859 wx[w21] B 0 > >> In this case,w7-w13 and w15-w18 were missed.How did it happen? And I >> want to use these answers in another program,so I wonder if the >> answers had been stored in arrays or anything that I can read >> directly(not read the answers form a output file) > > Elemental variables wx[w7], wx[8], etc. do not appear in any > constraint, so the mathprog translator does not generate them. > From the formal point of view such variables may have any value in > optimal solution. > > _______________________________________________ > Help-glpk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-some-answers-missed-tp18213838p18232837.html Sent from the Gnu - GLPK - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
