> Thank you for asking. It seems to be OK on my machine, the fi-s are > searchable, etc.
> Just one question: why did you remove the function names from the > table of contents? It seemed to me that without routine names the TOC looks better (probably because I do not need to consult the reference manual :). > I just loved the old documentation, it was enough to have a quick look > at the TOC and i knew which function to use. > In am not able to do that in the new one, very hard to find the > function name i am looking for so i still use the old docs. Okay, I will make a new edition with the names. > It would be handy to have links also to the corresponding pages, > though i do not know how much work that would be or portability issues > etc. If it is a dumb proposal, please forget it. The new edition of the reference manual in pdf format will be provided with hyperlinks in the TOC. _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
