Hello Andrew >> 1. Is glpk.i sufficient to use swig (assuming that the user knows >> what it is and how to use it)?
glpk.i is all that is needed to control swig. My expectation is that many users who want to use GLPK in Java (or other languages) do not know which parameters to pass to Swig and how to build a dll (or .so-library) to make use of GLPK. Hence I would appreciate makefiles to be provided. >> 2. Build_JNI_with_VC9_DLL.bat builds one dll, which includes the >> wrapper module. However it seems to me that it is better to build >> the glpk dll separately from the wrapper dll. What do you think? It would make sense to separate a glpk library on one side and (possibly multiple) language dependent wrapper libraries. (I remember the discussion about reducing dependencies for odbc in the Debian distribution.) Best regards Xypron -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Patch-for-GLPK-4.35-to-support-SWIG-tp21732549p21818230.html Sent from the Gnu - GLPK - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
