I think that flushing the output more often should not be an option.
Flushing in this case is cheap and prevents stream readers (another process
or a text file) from staying outdated...

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Hart, William E <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, Andrew.
>
> By default, IO streams are not regularly flushed; they are buffered in the
> computer until 'enough' IO has been done (or until the stream is closed).
>
> I'm piping glpsol through some Python code and this buffering is creating a
> noticable delay in my processing.  What I'd like is an option that enables
> explicit flushing of glpsol's output.  For example, after each status line
> is printed, you might execute:
>
>  flush(stdout)
>
> (or do "cout << flush" in C++).
>
> --Bill
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Makhorin [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 5:27 PM
> > To: Hart, William E
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Help-glpk] Feature request - option to flush output
> >
> > > I'd like to see an option in GLPK that allows the output
> > summary to be
> > > flushed on a regular basis.  I understand why you might leave this
> > > 'off' by default, but allowing users to have very active
> > updates adds
> > > some value to their interactions with GLPK.
> >
> > Could you please clarify your request in more details? Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Andrew Makhorin
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-glpk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
>



-- 
=============================================================
Haroldo Gambini Santos
Computing Department - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto - UFOP
email: [email protected]
home/research page:  http://www.decom.ufop.br/prof/haroldo/

“BE the change you want to see in the world” -Mahatma Gandhi
_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk

Reply via email to