> > >C:\xrcs>E:\Dev-Cpp\bin\gcc -LC:\xrcs\glpk-4.44 sample.o -lglpk -lm
> > >
> > >gives an error
> > >
> > >E:\Dev-
> > Cpp\bin\..\lib\gcc\mingw32\3.4.2\..\..\..\..\mingw32\bin\ld.exe: cannot
> > find -lglpk
> > >collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > >
> > >What's wrong?
> >
> > I don't use Windows, but I'd try checking your Library path.  If I'm
> > not mistaken, the GLPK library is built into the src directory.  Try
> > this as your library path flag:
> >
> > -LC:\xrcs\glpk-4.44\src
> >
> > Let us know how it goes.
> >
> 
> I've tried. It's the same result.


>>
>> Let us know how it goes.
>>

>I've tried. It's the same result.

Well, no one else is chiming in, so I guess you are stuck with me.  Maybe a 
Windows user will help out?

Have you actually installed glpk?  If so, the library should be in a default 
location and ready to be linked against.  If you haven't done a 'make install' 
for GLPK, I'd recommend you try that next and then figure out where the library 
file goes (is it a .dll for Windows?).  You shouldn't even need a -L flag if 
the library is installed in a default location, though you can supply one 
anyway if you know where the installed library lives.

>From the GLPK manual:

If the library is installed in the default location /usr/local/lib, the 
following typical command may be used to link, say, the example C program 
described above against with the library: 
$ gcc sample.o -lglpk -lm 
If the GLPK library is not in the default location, the corresponding 
directory containing it should be made known to the linker through -L 
option, for example: 
$ gcc -L/foo/bar/glpk-4.15 sample.o -lglpk -lm 



Keep us posted.

Joey



_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
  • [Help-glpk] RE:... Rios, Joseph L. (ARC-AFO)
    • [Help-glpk... Нестеренко Геннадий Витальевич
    • [Help-glpk... Rios, Joseph L. (ARC-AFO)
      • [Help-... Нестеренко Геннадий Витальевич
    • Re: [Help-... Nigel Galloway
      • RE: [H... Нестеренко Геннадий Витальевич

Reply via email to