On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:50:47 -0600 (CST) Michael Hennebry <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, GLENN RHOADS wrote: > > >>> A: min|aij| = 4.000e-01 max|aij| = 2.800e+00 ratio = > 7.000e+00 > >>> Problem data seem to be well scaled > > > Thanks. That solves the excessive output problem. > > Any suggestions on which scaling method might be preferred for my > > application? I think what is happening is that some of the > > coefficients are for all practical purposes effectively 0. These > > "effective zeroes" are being represented in the matrix as some very > > small number, e.g. 7.2134e-32, whereas the other entries are of a > > common everyday size like 8.2, or 0.34. Which scaling method would > be > > preferred for handling this situation? > > Are you sure? > According to the message, min|aij|=0.4 .
Well, I actually had to get rid of a few xprintf() calls (I commented them out). _______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
