> I have seen that the routines to handle MPS files were re-implemented> in > version 4.38. According to these changes I found a different> behavior in > the interpretation of integers w/o upper bound. It seems> that an integer > w/o a defined upper bound is interpreted as a binary> variable. I guess that > there is a new default value for a missing> upper bound of an integer > variable ( value of 1 instead of infinity in> the older versions). Am I > right with these assumptions? > Yes. This modification was intentionally made > to provide conformity withthe reference specification of the MPS format given > in the IBM OSLmanual. Under the heading "BOUNDS Section" and the subheading > "Default Bounds,"the OSL manual says the following:"For integer variables, > the default bounds on columns are 0 and 1."
_______________________________________________ Help-glpk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
