I dont think either Nigel's or Robbie's response or either off topic or should
be resisted.
I think the intent of the paper tries to answer a very valid question where most of the interest to
me is not the conclusions of the paper, but rather the stimulus for discussion on how do you
evaluate a 'best' modelling language. One of the reasons for my interest in GLPK is the meld of
mathematical, operations research and industrial application that this field encompasses and seeing
and responding to all of the different perspectives leads to a much more useful end product.
Certainly the topic is not covered in the depth and breadth that would be required for a
comprehensive comparison in an undergraduate thesis, but the question still is one worthy of
exploration.
Regards,
Harley Mackenzie
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Harley Mackenzie ABN: 36 348 783 012
HARD Software Web: www.hardsoftware.com
PO BOX 8004 Tel: +61 3 5222 3435
Newtown 3220, Australia Email: [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
