Hello Andrew,
in GLPK 4.48 you plan to replace
typedef struct { double _opaque_tree[100]; } glp_tree;
by the new definition
typedef struct glp_tree glp_tree
Some wrappers for GLPK like Rglpk (for Ruby), GLPK for Java, and Python-GLPK
use Swig for generating the wrapping code.
Now Swig will no longer create a class glp_tree but only a class
SWIGTYPE_p_glp_tree.
This implies programmers using GLPK with Python, Java, or Ruby and said
wrappers may have to change their code.
I must admit that the new definition looks neater in C. Due to the impact in
other languages I would be very happy if you could revert it to ensure
backwards compatibility for non C users of GLPK.
Best regards
Heinrich Schuchardt
_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
