On a more serious note... I don’t think local set/param declaration is that useful. In the example given, you could create a one-dimensional array of sets and params that does the same thing.
-Marc -----Original Message----- From: Help-glpk <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Andrew Makhorin Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 5:03 PM To: Domingo Alvarez Duarte <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: Adding scoped local set/param declaration to GMPL On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 22:12 +0200, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote: > Hello ! > > I'm experimenting with allow local set/param declarations inside > scoped blocks (for/if/then/else), it's the base to possibly experiment > further with problem/callback/function declarations you can > see/experiment with it in this branch > https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/tree/local-set-para > m > , look at > https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/blob/local-set-param/examples/shikaku > -if.mod > and > https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/blob/local-set-param/examples/test-if > .mod > to see it's usage. > > ==== > > for{i in 1..4} { > printf "now we are at %d\n", i; > if i mod 2 = 0 then { #assert when missing "= 0" > param lp := i+10; > set ls := {1..i+1}; > printf "nested if lp = %d\n", lp; > display ls; > } > param lp := i+20; > set ls := {1..i+2}; > printf "nested for lp = %d\n", lp; > display ls; > } > > ==== > > Any comment/suggestion is welcome ! > > Cheers ! > > > I guess the next step will be implementation of classes? ;) ________________________________ This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation.
