-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chad Walstrom wrote: > Mel Hatzis wrote: > >>No one has responded to my patch thus far. I plan on committing the >>changes Thursday evening (PST) provided no one speaks up in the >>meantime. > > > I haven't had a chance to look it over in detail, yet. We haven't > released 4.1, either, though I'm hoping that my patches and Mike's will > be the last. Now is the time to decide whether or not to include your > patches in 4.1 or wait until 4.2.
There's no harm in applying this patch to 4.1...the changes do not involve any functional deviations. In fact, there are a few good bug fixes in the patch, not to mention some performance improvements. > > If we want to wait, I'll get Mike's and my patches in tonight and branch > off the 4.1 tree from the trunk, making space for you to work on the 4.2 > release. I'll add clean-up touches to the 4.1 tree for release (if > there are any), and cherry pick any necessary changes back to trunk. > > If we want to include it in 4.1, then go ahead and apply to the trunk. > OK, I'll go ahead and commit to the mainline tomorrow morning (PST). Note that I ran the changes through a fairly comprehensive set of regression tests (which I put together) and they appear to be sound. I'll have the next patch out for review soon. - -Mel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHXkoNF74HmYqaSERAlC+AJkBY8yUz9T6Bvxoakr9PnxLrrODdQCfb7u+ mU01ZNH4cnsUj4WQd8zu0Z8= =fn4d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Help-gnats mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats
