Chad, Jeremy -
Thanks for the feedback. Being very accustomed to the Gnats 3.2 Emacs
interface I agree it is a very powerful interface. But I also know zip
about lisp, so I'm not able to look into the problems I'm seeing with
Gnats 4.1. Perhaps I'll just file them as gnats PRs once I'm past the
immediate hurdles.
I'm familiar and comfortable with the command-line interface too, but
we're an Emacs-centric house. When asked the Emacs-vs.-web-interface
question one of our developers once said "If I had to choose between
gnats-via-emacs and a tool that required a web browser, I'd choose gnats
seven days a week and twice on Sunday". :) This was as much a preference
for gnats as emacs... thanks everyone who maintains it!
- Chuck
Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
I have used the Emacs interface with the old 3.2, but I had problems
with the 4.1 and I believe my findings were that the emacs mode is
falling behind in keeping up to date with the releases.
I will say that the Emacs interface *is* one of the best interfaces to
Gnats around. It's integration into emacs was nothing short of
awesome. I wish the author would keep up the great work. It's just too
easy to make a few macros here and there to log new bugs right at your
source line, or quickly mark one complete, etc...
Jeremy
Chad Walstrom wrote:
Chuck Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm almost finished upgrading our ancient Gnats 3.2 installation to
4.1.0. But including support for the emacs interface in 4.1.0 has
proved to be quite a challenge. I've seen a few comments - most
ultimately unanswered and none resembling my problems - in gnats'
own PR db and this list, so before I ask about the problems I'm
having I wanted to ask if anyone is using the Emacs interface to
gnats? Or has everyone switched to GnatsWeb/TkGnats?
_______________________________________________
Help-gnats mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats
