>>>>> "n" == nfreimann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
n> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> If someone is happy with Notepad, they probably don't need Emacs. And >> >> n> Eli, what he wants to tell us is, that CUA bindings and GUI dialogs n> are common today, and not proprietary key bindings and dialogs a la n> mini buffer or something. I find Emacs "proprietary" (prorietary and Emacs sounds like an oxymoron[?]) much smarter than CUA ones (that you can activate by means of a menu item, at least in my "GNU Emacs 21.3.50.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0) of 2004-11-20 on cyrano" and minibuffer much more powerful than dialogs, anyway. I can see NO modern tool matching Emacs editing power (neither that of the tools of the sixes). -- /\ ___ /___/\__|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____________________ //--\ | | \| | Integralista GNUslamico \/ e coltivatore diretto di software _______________________________________________ Help-gnu-emacs mailing list Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
