Olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> Olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>I used to use the standard TeX mode but D. Kastrup have convinced me >>>that auctex is better. >> Actually, it was not really my intent to turn you from the default >> tex-mode.el as long as it was an informed decision. >> >>>My principal trouble about it is that I can't figure out on what >>>functions the command on the menu are bound. I would like to define >>>"\C-c\C-f" to be bound to the LaTeX command I see in the menu (to >>>emulate the key in the stand. mode). >> This can be called a deficiency of AUCTeX, so it would probably be >> best discussed on auctex-devel at gnu.org. >> >>>But if a do a describe-key on this item; I get something like >>>menu-function-<some-number>; which I think is dynamically generated >>>(?) >> Yes, more or less. >> You probably want something like >> (TeX-command "LaTeX" 'TeX-master-file 0) > > I had already tried this (after having looked in the source code; > trying to guess how thing are done); but then the files are not > saved if there are been modified (I have configured auctex to save > all the modified files). I have not tried to remake the LaTeX > command by trying to save the files myself since this command > already exists and I tought that all I have to do is to "locate it".
No such command exists yet. This is done in the course of TeX-command-query which is not consulted here. You need to do something like (TeX-save-document (TeX-master-file)) yourself. Again: this is rather a topic for the developer list of AUCTeX than for this group. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Help-gnu-emacs mailing list Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
