In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jay Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phillip Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Corneli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Joe> On Sun, Apr 10 2005, Joe Corneli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Joe> wrote:
> >
> > >> But, note, what you should really do is byte compile the .emacs,
> >
> > Joe> Why? Typically this isn't worth the trouble ("Changes is my
> > Joe> .emacs are ignored!!!1 What's wrong???ß").
> >
> >
> > Joe> OK, I guess I was wrong. I personally always byte compile mine
> > Joe> b/c otherwise emacs complains that the source file is newer.
> > Joe> Other people might not have that problem :). But perhaps I'm
> > Joe> the one who should change...
> >
> > If you don't byte-compile it at all, then it won't.
>
> And of course remove the .elc file.
But if you don't byte-compile it at all, where would that file have come
from?
--
Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
_______________________________________________
Help-gnu-emacs mailing list
Help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
