On 13 May 2005 17:19:50 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been developing a mathematical library (Open Optimization Library > - OOL, ool.sourceforge.net) and I employ the GNU tools > autoconf/automake. Using libtool or ar? > The usual is that the library generated is compiled with optimization > flags and then stripped. To test the library I use a simple program > that obviously is linked with it. I would like to run DDD on this main > program but, since the library file is stripped, I cant trace the > execution into the library's functions. When is it stripped? My ones are only stripped when installed (using "make install-strip"), so my test programs link with the 'local' version just generated. However, I use ar rather than libtool, this may be a difference. > Is there a way to generate the library file (libool.la) without any > optimization flag and unstripped? It sounds as though you need a way to change the build flags so they are different between 'production' and 'development' versions. How about using one of the --with or --enable options to configure to select the CFLAGS? Chris C _______________________________________________ help-gnu-utils mailing list help-gnu-utils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-utils
