Thomas Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> file_a.o : file_a.c file_a.h
>
> file_b.o : file_b.c file_b.h
>
> file_c.o : file_c.c file_c.h
>
> file_d.o : file_d.c file_d.h
>
> In the above scenario, if all the '.o' file are deleted, the gcc
> compiler will be invoked four times, once for each file.
You can do this:
file_a.o file_b.o file_c.o file_d.o: \
file_a.c file_b.c file_c.c file_d.c \
file_a.h file_b.h file_c.h file_d.h
gcc -c file_a.c file_b.c file_c.c file_d.c
The downside this way is that all four files will be recompiled even
if only one is out of date. You should probably measure the build
time for each of the two Makefiles, and in each situation (full
rebuild vs. updating one file) to see which is better overall.
paul
_______________________________________________
help-gnu-utils mailing list
help-gnu-utils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-utils
