Nuno J. Silva wrote: > I changed it so for now it does exactly that - it's way better than the > (ugly) way I was doing it (appending the suffix to the random name and > aboting because it hit an existing file).
Good deal! Bob
Nuno J. Silva wrote: > I changed it so for now it does exactly that - it's way better than the > (ugly) way I was doing it (appending the suffix to the random name and > aboting because it hit an existing file).
Good deal! Bob