On Dec 3, 2007 1:17 PM, a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. (this seems more critical) time step is not decreased (or not
> decreased enough) when the transition occurs. Sure, additional events
> are added but all devices (bsim3) driven by this signal are not
> modeled exactly.

Actually the timestep seems to decrease - setting trstepgrow=1.5
(default "infinitive") helps quite a bit. Unfortunately setting
trstepgrow to 1.4 effectively hangs gnucap (the simulation goes down
to minimum step).

Still I have a feeling that playing with options is a hack. Why gnucap
does not recognize that the state of the circuit (bsim3 transistors)
changes and it should simulate the transition more precisely?

-r.


_______________________________________________
Help-gnucap mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnucap

Reply via email to