Thank you guys, I will try this on monday, it seem to work on my
personal computer though !
Le 2012-10-20 18:00, [email protected] a écrit :
Send Help-gnucap mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnucap
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Help-gnucap digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Output buffer size (al davis)
2. Re: Output buffer size (Felix Salfelder)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:13:24 -0400
From: al davis <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Help-gnucap] Output buffer size
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Friday 19 October 2012, Romain GAILLETON wrote:
got an issue, when using huge amount of nodes the output of
gnucap is formated like this
v(1) .......................... v(n)\n\r
+ v(n+1) ...................... v(m)
by any change, would there be a way to change the output
buffer size to avoid this sequence please ? "\r\n+ "
option outwidth=_____
The default value is 9999 (characters). You have a lot of data
there. It might be a good idea to carefully select fewer
probes. In my experience, when the circuit is that big, I don't
really want to look at all that. It runs faster if you reduce
the output data.
Speaking of reducing the output data ...... If you are doing a
transient analysis, specify "trace all" on the transient
command, which prints all time steps including the hidden ones
(which increases the data) then specify a huge step size, and
let gnucap's automatic step control determine what is needed.
Usually, you get all of better accuracy, faster run time, and
smaller output data.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:04:08 +0200
From: Felix Salfelder <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Help-gnucap] Output buffer size
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:13:24PM -0400, al davis wrote:
On Friday 19 October 2012, Romain GAILLETON wrote:
> got an issue, when using huge amount of nodes the output of
> gnucap is formated like this [..]
option outwidth=_____
The default value is 9999 (characters). You have a lot of data
there.
shouldnt outwidth better default to "no limit" (== 0?)? this looks
more
natural: users like Romain who don't need it and probably autoprocess
the output wouldnt run into it.
i cant think of a use case of "random" newlines in the output right
now,
but i guess it would involve changing the value anyway.
YMMV
felix
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Help-gnucap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnucap
End of Help-gnucap Digest, Vol 85, Issue 2
******************************************
_______________________________________________
Help-gnucap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnucap
