On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Simon Josefsson wrote:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/1267

of any help?

Thanks. This helps me a bit but more for the non-blocking case with send/recv, which I haven't really gotten to yet. I don't see how this helps me for the handshake case.


If I understand correctly, though, GnuTLS perform some internal buffering, so calling select might not be reliable. But I don't have much experience with non-blocking I/O and GnuTLS. Perhaps Nikos can chime in. I'm not sure how portable it is for GnuTLS to push data back into the OS buffers, which would be one way to make select() work as expected.

It doesn't sound like the proper way to proceed.

In my simple-minded view, it would be better if there is a function we could use to ask gnutls if there is more data in its buffers or not (compare with SSL_pending() in OpenSSL) so that we then can call gnutls again without doing select() and only if gnutls can't do more we wait for more socket actions.

You may take this question as a request for some clarification in the docs on how gnutls behaves when using blocking vs non-blocking sockets.

--
         -=- Daniel Stenberg -=- http://daniel.haxx.se -=-
  ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol


_______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls

Reply via email to