On Wednesday 08 June 2005 20:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, that was the kind of solution I was looking for. Something that > would not require reading from the socket outside the main loop. > However, the solution proposed has made gnutls_record_recv go into a > loop. It should return with 0 bytes read to the caller. I will check 0 means EOF from the stream so it is not a valid return value. gnutls should return GNUTLS_E_AGAIN. It will not get in a loop.
-- Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
