On 3/16/06, Cameron Ring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > from the application side, i guess i could grab the transport ptr and set > a timeout on the socket before calling gnutls_bye. does that sound > reasonable?
Check Simon's reply. An alternative way would be to use the SHUT_WR option to gnutls_bye(). That way you don't have to wait for the peer to reply with a close request. But in any case you may want to handle timeouts because you may also get hang in a gnutls_record_recv() call. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
