Hi, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PS. Maybe you are aware of it, but did you look at GPGME? It has > more PGP stuff, and written in a more GnuPG compatible way. I know it > has some limitations though. I'd wish that GnuTLS could use it > instead of OpenCDK, but right now it doesn't... I had this feeling, at first, but for some purposes GPGME turns out to be too high-level, and too much GPG-oriented. For instance, while gnutls-extra currently provides first-class public/private and keyring objects, GPGME doesn't provide such a thing. Instead, GPGME expects any key that is to be handled to be imported in the per-user GPG keyring. That can be quite inconvenient for applications that use keys meaningless to the user (as a person), or that do not want keys to be stored on the file system just because they were imported once for verification purposes. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
