devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > El jue, 03-05-2007 a las 14:03 +0200, Simon Josefsson escribió: >> Hi! >> >> I've created some tables with a comparison between common TLS >> implementations. I'm running short of ideas on things to compare. Any >> ideas or suggestions? The URL is: > > Suggestion: > > Implementations of usable software. In this, I think that gnutls is less > than OpenSSL, for example mod_ssl of apache. Vitality of projects that > support GNUTLS, OPENSSL,... > Lifetime projects.
I find it difficult to measure those things. Any suggestion exactly how a table measuring those things would look like? > Critical bugs. A list of published vulnerabilities may be relevant here... > Support to hardware accelerator and other devices. Adding it would be good. > Lines of code. I added a 'code size' Table. The 60kLoc is for the core library. I'm not sure what a good way to compute kloc is for a project with required dependencies... Anyway, it is a start. /Simon > ... > Etc. > > >> >> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/comparison.html >> >> What do you think? >> >> Also, if you notice any mistakes, or know for sure the status on some I >> put down as 'No?', please let me know and I'll fix it. >> >> /Simon >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Help-gnutls mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls > -- > -- > Publicidad http://www.pas-world.com _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
