On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Then, yes it _does_ fix the worst leaks in my test case. The reamining leak
now looks like this (with a build using only -g and not -O2 that otherwise
confuse symbols like the ones in my initial report):
==13872== 128 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 8
What about this patch? It's quite intrusive. My development environment is
almost inexistent now, thus I'd appreciate if you or any other volunteers
could test it.
Bingo! No leak left in this test case with this patch applied - I did apply it
over the previous one you posted, I got one reject but that turned out to be
because that was already changed in the previous patch.
_______________________________________________
Help-gnutls mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
