Brad Hards wrote: > On Tuesday 14 July 2009 19:46:10 Brad Hards wrote: >> On Monday 13 July 2009 16:33:48 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >>> Actually I think it might be much easier to do that inside gnutls by >>> extending get_subject_alt_name() to be able to accept the OID as >>> parameter to parse the 2.5.29.18 extension as well. Then would be easy >>> to submit a gnutls_x509_crt_get_issuer_alt_name that can be added to >>> gnutls. >> I had a first cut at this. See attached patch. > [I realise this can't be applied yet - I'm just looking for feedback] > > Here is an example that I was sent a while ago, and what I see running it > through > certtool. Do you think it is worth adding that as a unit test?
Yes. _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
