On 04/20/2010 11:06 AM, Ali Khalfan wrote:
> Is there something I'm missing here about  gnutls's architecture?  It
> doesn't seem to be logical that there would be one generic function that
> would take care of all the different algorithm types, and I don't
> believe that gnutls is relying on openssl

GnuTLS relies on gcrypt for its low-level crypto-primitives.

There has als been some discussion in the recent past about making
gnutls  flexible enough to use an alternate low-level library (such as
nettle), but i don't think that's in place at the moment.

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Help-gnutls mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls

Reply via email to